$75 Billion Recovered. The False Claims Act Is the Most Powerful Anti-Fraud Law in America.
The False Claims Act is the single most effective legal weapon against fraud involving government funds. Originally signed into law by President Abraham Lincoln in 1863 to combat defense contractor fraud during the Civil War, the statute has evolved into a powerful mechanism that allows private citizens to sue on behalf of the government and share in the recovery. Since 1986, when Congress significantly strengthened the law, False Claims Act cases have recovered more than $75 billion for the federal treasury.
What Is a Qui Tam Action?
The False Claims Act's most distinctive feature is its "qui tam" provision, which allows private individuals -- known as "relators" -- to file lawsuits on behalf of the United States government against parties that have defrauded government programs. The term "qui tam" comes from the Latin phrase "qui tam pro domino rege quam pro se ipso," meaning "he who sues on behalf of the king as well as for himself."
In practical terms, a qui tam relator identifies fraud against the government, files a complaint under seal in federal court, and serves the complaint on the Department of Justice. The government then has a period (typically 60 days, though extensions are common) to investigate the allegations and decide whether to intervene and take over the case. If the government intervenes, it assumes primary responsibility for litigating the case, though the relator remains a party. If the government declines to intervene, the relator may proceed with the lawsuit independently.
Financial Rewards for Relators
The financial incentives under the False Claims Act are substantial:
- Government intervenes: The relator receives 15% to 25% of the total recovery, which can include treble damages (three times the amount of the fraud) plus civil penalties of over $13,000 per false claim.
- Government declines to intervene: The relator receives 25% to 30% of the total recovery if they successfully litigate the case on their own.
Given that False Claims Act settlements and judgments frequently reach into the hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars, relator shares can be extraordinarily large. In 2009, a relator received approximately $96 million from a healthcare fraud case against Pfizer. In 2012, a relator share in a case against GlaxoSmithKline exceeded $250 million.
What Constitutes a "False Claim"
The False Claims Act imposes liability on any person or entity that:
- Knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment to the government.
- Knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement material to a false claim.
- Conspires to commit any of the above violations.
- Knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement to conceal, avoid, or decrease an obligation to pay money to the government (known as a "reverse false claim").
The "knowingly" standard includes actual knowledge, deliberate ignorance, and reckless disregard for the truth. This means that a defendant does not need to have specific intent to defraud the government -- willful blindness to obvious fraud is sufficient.
Get notified about enforcement updates for U.S. Department of Justice
Industries Where False Claims Act Cases Are Most Common
Healthcare
Healthcare fraud accounts for the largest share of False Claims Act recoveries, consistently representing more than 60% of all qui tam settlements and judgments. Common healthcare fraud schemes include:
- Upcoding: Billing Medicare or Medicaid for more expensive procedures than those actually performed.
- Unbundling: Billing separately for services that should be billed together at a lower combined rate.
- Kickbacks: Paying physicians or other referral sources for patient referrals, in violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute.
- Off-label marketing: Promoting drugs for uses not approved by the FDA and then billing government healthcare programs for those unapproved uses.
- Phantom billing: Billing for services or equipment that were never provided.
- Substandard care: Billing for services that are so deficient they are essentially worthless.
Defense and Government Contracting
Defense contractors and government suppliers represent the second-largest category of False Claims Act cases. Fraud in this sector includes billing for defective products, inflating costs, substituting inferior materials, and misrepresenting compliance with contract specifications. The 2022 National Defense Authorization Act expanded whistleblower protections for defense contractor employees, reflecting the ongoing importance of insiders in detecting procurement fraud.
Other Sectors
False Claims Act cases also arise in education (student loan and financial aid fraud), housing (FHA mortgage fraud), infrastructure (bid rigging and cost inflation on government-funded projects), and technology (cybersecurity compliance failures by government IT contractors).
The Qui Tam Process: Timeline and Key Steps
- Filing under seal. The relator's attorney files the complaint in federal district court under seal, meaning it is not publicly accessible. This secrecy protects the integrity of the government's investigation.
- Service on the government. The complaint and a written disclosure of all material evidence are served on the Attorney General and the relevant U.S. Attorney's office.
- Investigation period. The government has at least 60 days to investigate, though this period is almost always extended -- sometimes for years -- as the DOJ conducts its review.
- Intervention decision. The government decides whether to intervene. Intervention significantly increases the likelihood of a successful outcome and a larger recovery.
- Litigation or settlement. Most False Claims Act cases settle before trial. Settlements typically include payment of damages, penalties, and sometimes corporate integrity agreements requiring the defendant to implement compliance reforms.
Anti-Retaliation Protections
Section 3730(h) of the False Claims Act provides robust anti-retaliation protections. Employees who are discharged, demoted, harassed, or otherwise discriminated against because of their qui tam activities are entitled to all relief necessary to make them whole, including:
- Reinstatement to the same seniority status
- Double back pay with interest
- Compensation for special damages, including litigation costs and reasonable attorneys' fees
State False Claims Acts
In addition to the federal law, more than 30 states and the District of Columbia have enacted their own false claims act statutes, many with qui tam provisions. State false claims acts typically focus on fraud involving state Medicaid programs, and relators can often file both federal and state claims simultaneously to maximize the total recovery and their share of it.
Is Your Information Actionable?
The strongest False Claims Act cases share several characteristics: specific and detailed evidence of the fraudulent conduct, quantifiable financial impact on the government, ongoing or recent fraud (not historical violations from decades ago), and an insider perspective that provides information the government does not already possess. If you have witnessed fraud against the government in your workplace, our free case assessment can help you determine whether your information could support a qui tam action and estimate the potential recovery.
Stay Updated on U.S. Department of Justice
Get notified when new complaints are filed, enforcement scores change, or new reports are published.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.